Thank you! Don't forget to confirm subscription in your email.
In thinking about religion and society in the 21st century, we should broaden the conversation about faith from doctrinal debates to the larger question of how it might inspire us to strengthen the bonds of belonging that redeem us from our solitude, helping us to construct together a gracious and generous social order.
Science cannot resolve moral conflicts, but it can help to more accurately frame the debates about those conflicts.
For all the tough talk about China during the presidential debates, Romney and Obama evaded any mention of China's suspect human rights record, corruption, and rule of law. By not tackling these controversial topics, the candidates are protecting a strategic partnership with China at the expense of essential human values and beliefs.
I wish I could give you a lot of advice, based on my experience of winning political debates. But I don't have that experience. My only experience is at losing them.
'Orphan Black' allows for people to have debates and theories and allegiances to different characters - to trust characters and hate other characters - but it doesn't tell you who is good or bad or right or wrong. That's the most exciting storytelling, in my book.
Debates go on to this day about what caused the Great Depression. Economics is not very good at explaining swings in economic activity.
I believe an invitation from the Commission on Presidential Debates is similar to a draft notice - a civic responsibility.
The days of the Pentagon Papers debates seem long past, when a sudden transparency yielded insight into fights over war and peace and freedom and security; the transparency afforded by Twitter and Facebook yields insights that extend no further than a lawmaker's boundless narcissism and a culture's pitiless prurience.
Debates require a lot of hard work and preparation. If you try to wing it, it shows.
To pull off successful attacks in debates, you have to execute with nuance and subtlety. It has to be artful.