Thank you! Don't forget to confirm subscription in your email.
We are more casual about qualifying the people we allow to act as advocates in the courtroom than we are about licensing electricians.
Jurors want courtroom lawyers to have some compassion and be nice.
Money will determine whether the accused goes to prison or walks out of the courtroom a free man.
Whereas if you have a camera in the courtroom, there's no filtering. What you see is what's there.
A fair trial is one in which the rules of evidence are honored, the accused has competent counsel, and the judge enforces the proper courtroom procedures - a trial in which every assumption can be challenged.
I think if somebody is so set in their ways about what they feel about something - and you get this a lot in academia, of course, and also different sorts of journalism too - you're going to sweep under the carpet the facts that don't suit your thesis. And I think that happens quite a lot in the courtroom, for instance.
Justice has nothing to do with what goes on in a courtroom; Justice is what comes out of a courtroom.
I grew up in a courtroom kind of like the one you saw in 'To Kill a Mockingbird' - big, big courtroom, sometimes it didn't even have air conditioning.
In the courtroom, it's where a lawyer really becomes an actor. There's a very fine line between delivering a monologue in a play and delivering a monologue to a jury. I've always felt that way - I've been in a lot of courtrooms. The best lawyers are really theatrical.
The judge turned his back towards me, sitting back on his judge's chair, while I was in the witness stand being questioned. The whole courtroom was full of these anarchists, leftists, communists and Jewish lobbyists.